The SEC Opened a Repo Clearing Exit. It Shrinks to 10% by 2030.

On Friday the SEC opened an exit from its own Treasury clearing mandate, and most of the coverage stopped there. Read the order. The exit has a door that closes. A big bank's foreign desks can keep repo with foreign clients off the clearinghouse up to a 25% cap starting June 30, 2027, and that allowance falls every year until it hits 10% after June 30, 2030.¹ I like the relief. I like the glide path even more. And I think the market is reading the headline backward for the one company about to start selling clearing into this.

Key Highlights

• The order: Release No. 34-106789 lets a capped share of "Qualifying Non-U.S. Transactions" and a wider class of inter-affiliate repo stay uncleared. The cap starts at 25% and steps down to 20%, 15% and then 10% after June 30, 2030.²
• The floor: Firms below a fixed $5 billion of qualifying non-U.S. repo are exempt regardless of the percentage test. One commenter asked for $10 billion and was turned down.³
• The market: U.S. repo averaged $12.75 trillion a day from July 2025 to February 2026, and $4.93 trillion of it was non-centrally cleared bilateral repo.⁴
• What moves: The OFR estimates the mandate could push about $1.5 trillion of uncleared repo into clearing, while roughly 70% of that segment stays bilateral.⁵
• The idea: CME Group (CME) traded at $303.89 on Monday, about 24.9 times trailing earnings and 7.7% below its 52-week high of $329.16, five weeks before its new Treasury clearinghouse is set to open.⁶

What The Order Actually Does

Start with the rule it amends. In December 2023 the SEC ordered that most secondary trades in Treasuries and Treasury repo be cleared through a central counterparty whenever one side is a member of that clearinghouse. The deadlines have already slipped once. Cash trades now have to clear by Dec. 31, 2026, and repo by June 30, 2027.⁷

Friday's order does two things.

First, it carves out what the SEC calls Qualifying Non-U.S. Transactions. That is uncleared repo between a non-U.S. client and a non-U.S. clearing member, a non-U.S. affiliate of a member, or a foreign branch of a U.S. member.⁸ Think of a London or Tokyo desk lending cash against Treasuries to a client in its own time zone, at an hour when no U.S. clearinghouse is open.

The carve-out is capped. A firm qualifies if those trades are less than the applicable percentage of its cleared repo plus the exempt trades, or if they total under $5 billion. Both tests use a rolling daily average of the prior three quarters. The firm then has to attest to every clearinghouse it belongs to that it is complying, and tell them right away if it is not.⁹

Second, it widens the affiliate exemption. Before Friday, a clearing member could skip clearing on repo with an affiliate only if that affiliate was a bank, a broker-dealer or a futures commission merchant. Now any majority-owned, consolidated affiliate counts, as long as it is not an investment company.¹⁰ The SEC's reasoning is that these trades move cash and collateral inside one balance sheet and create no outside risk.

Both requests came from the industry. The Institute of International Bankers asked in February for relief on foreign trades. SIFMA asked for the broader affiliate definition and an activity threshold for foreign affiliates.¹¹ The SEC merged the two into one order.

The Denominator Is The Story

Here's the part I keep rereading.

The percentage test is not exempt repo divided by all repo. It is exempt repo divided by the firm's cleared repo plus the exempt repo. The SEC says it left uncleared trades out of the denominator on purpose, and that it counts cleared repo even when clearing was never required, to "incentivize" firms to clear more.¹²

Read that as a trader would. If you want to keep more of your foreign book bilateral, the way to earn that room is to clear more of everything else.

That is not an exit. It's a swap. Every dollar of voluntary clearing buys you a fraction of a dollar of freedom, and the exchange rate gets worse each July. At a 25% cap, $3 of cleared repo supports $1 of exempt repo. At 10%, it takes $9.

The other direction matters too. Cross-border repo is not a rounding error. The OFR found that about 53% of uncleared bilateral repo, roughly $2.6 trillion, had a counterparty on the other side of the border.¹³ Banks and dealers often trade it with their own affiliates, which the OFR ties to internal liquidity management.⁴ This is the business Friday's order touches.

The Numbers That Matter

The U.S. repo market averaged $12.75 trillion a day in the OFR's latest sizing: $3.12 trillion tri-party, $4.70 trillion already cleared at the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation and $4.93 trillion bilateral and uncleared.⁴

That uncleared slice is bigger than anyone thought. The OFR's estimate in May 2024 was $2.3 trillion. Its new data collection found about $5 trillion.¹³

Now subtract. About $1.7 trillion is backed by collateral other than Treasuries, $1.3 trillion is affiliate repo and $0.2 trillion is both, so roughly $3.2 trillion is outside the rule from the start. The OFR's estimate of what the mandate could actually move is about $1.5 trillion.¹³ That estimate assumes firms use the affiliate exemption. Friday widened it.

The risk the mandate targets is real. The OFR found that 56% of broker-dealers' bilateral repos carried a zero haircut, and that among arm's-length trades about half involved hedge funds.¹³ Zero haircut means zero cushion.

Clearing was already growing before the mandate bites. The Chicago Fed estimates about 45% of repo was centrally cleared before the rule and roughly 77% will be after full implementation. For cash Treasuries, the move is from about 25% to about 65%.¹⁴ Daily cleared volume for sponsored repo at FICC hit a record $2.93 trillion on Jan. 2, 2026.¹⁵

The Free-Market Read

Let me give the other side its due first, because it has a strong case.

The Treasury market is the collateral underneath almost everything else. In 2020, at the onset of the pandemic, it seized up, and the Chicago Fed traces this mandate in part to that "dash for cash".¹⁶ A clearinghouse nets trades, collects margin from everyone and stands in the middle when a counterparty fails. A $5 trillion bilateral market where most dealer trades carry no haircut is exactly where you would expect a fire sale to start. If you believe that, you want every trade cleared and no exemptions.

I don't buy the last part.

A mandate is a captive market. Until late 2025, FICC was the only clearinghouse authorized to clear Treasuries and Treasury repo.¹⁶ Ordering an entire market to buy a service, when one firm sells it, is how you get a toll booth. The Chicago Fed's own economist says central clearing "may exhibit characteristics of a natural monopoly." In swaps, LCH ended up with more than 80% of client clearing between it and CME.¹⁶

That's why I care so much about the denominator. The SEC did not just hand the banks a permanent loophole. It priced the exemption. If you want bilateral room, you pay for it by clearing more, and the price rises every year. That is a market mechanism bolted onto a mandate. It treats the firm as the one who knows which of its trades are risky and which are a treasury desk moving cash between its own pockets at 3 a.m. New York time.

The affiliate change is the cleaner win. A repo between two subsidiaries of the same consolidated group does not add outside risk. Forcing it through a clearinghouse adds cost and margin for nothing. The SEC said as much.¹⁰

Here's what would make me angry: if the exemptions turned into a moat for the biggest global banks, the only ones with enough foreign affiliates to use them. The $5 billion floor helps there. It gives a mid-sized foreign dealer a simple bright line without a percentage test. I'd have preferred the $10 billion a commenter asked for. Still, a bright line beats a waiver process.

The best protection against a toll booth is a second road. That is now being built.

Winners And Losers

Global dealers with foreign books. They win the most right away. Their London and Asia desks get room to keep serving local clients bilateral repo after June 2027, and affiliate funding inside the group no longer needs a clearinghouse ticket.

FICC. It is the incumbent, and it loses a sliver of volume it might have been handed by decree. It also faces competition for the first time.

The new entrants. ICE Clear Credit's Treasury service went live in February 2026 and planned to add repo in the fourth quarter.¹⁷ CME says CME Securities Clearing will open on Dec. 7, 2026, pending regulatory approvals, clearing both Treasury cash and repo.¹⁸

Money funds and the buy side. More than $1.2 trillion of money fund assets already clear through FICC's sponsored repo, over 55% of their Treasury repo holdings.¹⁹ For them, a second and third clearinghouse means more pressure on fees and margin.

The Bear Case

I could be wrong about the market structure, and the Chicago Fed gives the strongest reason. Clearing rewards scale. The clearinghouse with the most trades nets the most, needs the least margin per trade and attracts the next client. In swaps that dynamic favored LCH, partly through a price gap between the two clearinghouses.¹⁶ FICC has cleared repo since 1995. If the same thing happens here, the entrants get leftovers.

Second, the relief itself trims the pie. The OFR's $1.5 trillion estimate already assumed the old affiliate exemption. A wider affiliate class plus the 25% foreign cap could pull that number down, and no one has published a revised estimate. I won't make one up.

Third, deadlines. Both deadlines already slipped a year. In September, the SEC's Uyeda said the agency "does not currently intend to extend these deadlines".²⁰ "Currently" is doing work in that sentence.

The Idea: CME Group (CME)

CME calls itself the world's leading derivatives marketplace. It runs the Treasury futures market and BrokerTec, a cash Treasury and repo trading platform. On Dec. 7 it plans to add a third piece: its own SEC-registered Treasury clearinghouse.

Why this order helps it. Friday's denominator rewards cleared repo. CME's pitch is capital efficiency. It plans to cross-margin Treasury cash and repo cleared at CME Securities Clearing against swaps, futures and options at its existing derivatives clearinghouse.¹⁶ For a global dealer trying to grow its cleared repo so it can keep its foreign book bilateral, a venue that lowers the margin bill on that extra clearing is worth a lot.

The data. The business into which this launches is already running hot. CME's third-quarter average daily volume was a record 29.4 million contracts, and Treasury futures and options volume rose 25% to 9.4 million a day. BrokerTec U.S. repo averaged $396 billion a day, and CME's cross-margining savings with FICC rose 36% from the second quarter.²¹ Revenue rose 13% to $1.7 billion and adjusted earnings per share rose 13% to $3.02.²²

What the market may be missing. The headline reads "SEC exempts repo from clearing," which sounds like less business for clearinghouses. I think it's the opposite for an entrant. The order makes cleared volume the currency firms spend to buy bilateral room. CME sells cleared volume plus a margin discount tied to its own futures and swaps book. The stock sits about 7.7% below its 52-week high at roughly 24.9 times trailing earnings⁶, and none of this new clearing revenue exists yet.

The risks. The launch is "subject to regulatory approval" and could slip. FICC's scale and its existing cross-margining partnership with CME could keep most flow where it is. Clearing fees may matter less than margin, so the revenue per trade may be small. And CME's volumes ride rate volatility, which can fade.

What would prove me wrong. If CME Securities Clearing misses its Dec. 7 open, or if by CME's first-quarter 2027 report it has not disclosed meaningful cleared Treasury or repo activity, the thesis is broken. If the SEC delays the June 30, 2027 repo deadline, I'd also step back. I keep score on every idea here, winners and losers: the FMR Idea Scorecard.

What To Watch Next

The calendar is tight, and I track the dates on the Deregulation Investor's Catalyst Calendar.

• Dec. 7, 2026: CME Securities Clearing's planned launch.¹⁸
• Dec. 31, 2026: Cash Treasury trades must clear.⁷
• June 30, 2027: Repo must clear and the 25% foreign cap starts.²³
• July 1, 2028: The cap drops to 20%, and keeps falling to 10% after June 30, 2030.

One more thing to watch: whether a single foreign bank tells a clearinghouse it has breached the cap. The order says that notice goes out "immediately." The first one will tell you whether the glide path is working.

For more on how the SEC is rewiring market plumbing, read my take on the plan to drop the rule behind 17 stock exchanges, the proposal that would let bond funds skip the dealer toll booth, and why the FDIC is taking back a job it handed 31 big banks.

Related analysis

• The SEC Just Detached Its Post-Madoff Audit Backstop
• The FDIC Just Closed a 30-Year Gap in Interstate Banking. Digital Banks Were the Reason.
• The Treasury Just Opened 60 Million Investment Accounts in One Day

The Free Markets Report is provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. All opinions and views mentioned in this report constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time. Information within this material is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any individual investor. Trading signals produced by the Free Markets Report are independent of other services provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC or its affiliates, and positioning of accounts under their management may differ. Please remember that investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and past performance may not be indicative of future results. Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC, its members, officers, directors and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The Free Markets Report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of our investment services or performance. THE INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF INDIVIDUALS WHO MIGHT RECEIVE IT. THE INVESTMENTS DISCUSSED MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS. INVESTORS MUST MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTMENT DECISIONS BASED ON THEIR OWN PARTICULAR FINANCIAL SITUATIONS AND OBJECTIVES. This report is not an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services in any jurisdiction in which Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC is not authorized to provide such services. All investments involve risk, including the risk of loss of principal. No representation is being made that any security, account, or strategy is or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown. Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, and Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC's charges and expenses. This report is not a prospectus and does not contain all of the information necessary to fully evaluate any security or strategy discussed, including, but not limited to, the risk of adverse effects of related market developments. You should not rely solely on the information contained in this report, and should seek advice based on your situation from a licensed investment professional. Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of any investment product before investing. This report may not be copied or distributed without the express written consent of Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. Any decisions made based on any or all of the information in this writing are the sole responsibility of the user, and the user should exercise caution and take appropriate advice before acting.