> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.freemarketsreport.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# The NRC Will Stop Re-Testing Reactors the Government Already Ran
- URL: https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-nrc-will-stop-re-testing-reactors-the-government-already-ran/
- Published: 2026-10-25T15:14:50.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-25T15:14:50.000Z
- Description: The NRC finalized a rule that lets commercial reactor applicants use test data from reactors DOE or the military already authorized and ran. The mechanism, the winners, the bear case and one stock idea.
- Author: Michael A. Gayed, CFA

**The Nuclear Regulatory Commission just agreed to stop re-proving what the government already proved. On Oct. 22 it finalized a rule that lets a commercial reactor applicant use the test data from a reactor the Department of Energy or the Department of War already authorized and ran. That sounds like paperwork. I think it is the most important thing Washington has done for nuclear supply this year, because it turns a federal test reactor into a head start on a commercial license. And the stocks that should benefit most are trading near their lows.**

## Key Highlights

- **The rule:** The NRC added a new Section 50.43(f) and revised Section 53.440(a)(1) so an applicant can cite a reactor "previously authorized by the Department of Energy or the Department of Defense" that "has been tested and has demonstrated the ability to function safely"; it takes effect Nov. 25, 2026.[1](#fn-1)
- **The pipeline:** Five DOE-authorized reactors reached criticality between June 4 and Aug. 5, 2026, the last of them Oklo's Groves test reactor in Lockhart, Texas.[2](#fn-2)
- **The military lane:** The Army's Janus program will commit up to $2.2 billion over fiscal 2027-2031 to five microreactor vendors, including BWXT at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.[3](#fn-3)
- **The disconnect:** BWX Technologies (BWXT) closed Oct. 23 at $127.19, 46.7% below its April 15 close of $238.42, after raising its 2026 earnings guidance to $4.70-$4.80 a share.[4](#fn-4), [5](#fn-5)
- **The idea:** At that price BWXT trades at about 26.8 times the midpoint of its own 2026 guidance, against 51.6 times at the April high, by my arithmetic.[5](#fn-5)

Here is the problem the rule fixes, in one line. For decades the United States had two governments testing reactors and one regulator that acted as if the first two did not exist.

That stops on Nov. 25.

![Timeline of five DOE-authorized reactors reaching criticality in 2026: Antares Mark-0 on June 4, Valar Atomics Ward 250 on June 18, Deployable Energy Unity on June 30, Aalo Atomics Aalo-X on July 4 and Oklo Groves on August 5](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart1_timeline-8.png)

Source: POWER Magazine[6](#fn-6) and U.S. Department of Energy[7](#fn-7). All five were zero-power or low-power criticality tests.

## The surface story

The headline version is simple. The NRC says the rule lets applicants "use relevant analyses, test data and other information" from DOE or Department of War demonstration programs to support a commercial license.[8](#fn-8) Chairman Ho Nieh called it the delivery of the executive order's "vision for an expedited path from DOE and DOW projects to NRC commercial licensing".[9](#fn-9)

The rule answers Section 5(d) of Executive Order 14300, signed May 23, 2025\. That order says NRC review of designs the government already tested "shall focus solely on risks that may arise from new applications permitted by NRC licensure, rather than revisiting risks that have already been addressed in the DOE or DOD processes".[10](#fn-10)

The commission voted 5-0 to take the rule up with less than a week of public notice, then affirmed it at its Oct. 22 meeting.[11](#fn-11) It drew 136 unique comment submissions on the proposal.[12](#fn-12)

That is the surface. The surface is incomplete.

## The mechanism

Read the actual regulatory text and you see how narrow, and how useful, the change is. The new Section 50.43(f) says an application "may include consideration of relevant information gathered from a utilization facility that has been previously authorized by the Department of Energy or the Department of Defense." The applicant "must identify how attributes of the authorization satisfy NRC regulations".[13](#fn-13)

So the safety bar does not move. What moves is the evidence you are allowed to bring to it.

Before this rule, a developer that ran a reactor under DOE authority at Idaho National Laboratory still had to rebuild its case for the NRC as if the test never happened. Now the NRC says it "will not need to repeat technical reviews previously performed by DOE or DOW, to the extent that those reviews cover the same scope".[14](#fn-14) The applicant still has to explain every difference in design, siting, hazards or safety assumptions.

Then there is the quiet second document. The same pathway is written into the NRC's proposed Part 57, the separate licensing framework for microreactors and similar low-risk designs proposed on May 1, 2026.[15](#fn-15) Nieh said the defining feature of this rule "is that it works well with Part 57".[16](#fn-16)

Put those together and you get a sequence. Build and test under DOE or the military. Bring that data to the NRC under Part 50, 53 or, once finalized, 57\. Get a review that focuses on what is new. If you are a microreactor developer, that is the path from prototype to product, and it now exists in regulation instead of in a press release.

The NRC is not a rubber stamp, and it says so. Nieh told reporters: "This is not a shortcut; it is not a compromise".[17](#fn-17) Staff said the agency could apply more scrutiny than DOE or the military in areas such as consequence analysis, natural hazards and material qualification.[17](#fn-17) I believe him. I also think the most valuable thing a regulator can give a builder is a known path, and this is one.

## Winners and losers

**Winners: anyone with a federally authorized reactor already running or being built.** Five DOE-authorized reactors have reached criticality: Antares Nuclear's Mark-0 on June 4, Valar Atomics' Ward 250 on June 18, Deployable Energy's Unity on June 30, Aalo Atomics' Aalo-X test reactor on July 4 and Oklo's Groves test reactor on Aug. 5.[18](#fn-18) DOE picked 11 initial projects from 10 companies for its Reactor Pilot Program in August 2025.[6](#fn-6) Four of the five that went critical are private. Oklo is the only one you can buy on an exchange.

**Winners: the military's builders.** The Army's Janus program selected Antares at Fort Bragg, BWXT Advanced Technologies at Fort Campbell, General Atomics at Fort Hood, Radiant at Fort Benning and Westinghouse Government Services at Fort Drum.[19](#fn-19) The Army expects more than 20 microreactors across Department of War installations once private money joins the program.[19](#fn-19) Those reactors are authorized by the military, not the NRC. Under this rule, that authorization becomes evidence for a commercial license later.

**Winners: the fuel makers.** Every one of these designs needs fuel, and much of the advanced fleet runs on TRISO particles. BWXT said in June it was producing TRISO fuel compacts for Antares ahead of the July 4 criticality goal, and that it had shipped a full core of TRISO compacts to Idaho National Laboratory for the Project Pele demonstration reactor.[20](#fn-20)

**Losers: the slow lane, and the lawyers who bill it.** Duplicate reviews are a cost with no product at the end. The NRC's own analysis says it expects "cost savings to both applicants in preparing an application and the NRC in reviewing that application," though it could not put a dollar figure on them.[14](#fn-14) I wish it had tried. A number would make the next fight easier.

**Possible losers: large light-water incumbents.** I would not overstate this. TVA's Clinch River small modular reactor got its NRC construction permit on Sept. 29 after a 14-month review, four months ahead of schedule.[21](#fn-21) The conventional path is getting faster too. But a faster path for small, factory-built designs means more competition for every utility contract, and competition is the point.

## The numbers

Here is the number that caught my eye. The rules for nuclear have loosened all year, and the public nuclear stocks have fallen hard anyway.

![Line chart of BWXT and Oklo share prices rebased to 100 on October 1, 2025, with BWXT at 68 and Oklo at 23 on October 23, 2026](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart2_rebased.png)

Source: Perplexity Finance[22](#fn-22) daily closes, Oct. 1, 2025 to Oct. 23, 2026\. Rebasing is my arithmetic.

Rebased to Oct. 1, 2025, BWXT sits at 68 and Oklo at 23, by my arithmetic on daily closes.[4](#fn-4), [23](#fn-23) Oklo closed at $26.35 on Oct. 23, about 85% below its October 2025 closing high of $174.14.[23](#fn-23)

The market did not ignore the policy. It repriced the money.

The selloff lines up with the rate shock more than with anything the companies reported. BWXT hit fresh 52-week lows in mid-October during a broad selloff tied to rising Treasury yields and oil.[4](#fn-4) Long-dated growth stories get hit first when the discount rate jumps.

Now look at what BWXT actually reported. Second-quarter revenue rose to $901.6 million and non-GAAP earnings were $1.07 a share. Backlog stood at $8.40 billion, of which $6.80 billion was in Government Operations. Management raised 2026 guidance to about $3.8 billion of revenue, $662-$672 million of adjusted EBITDA, $4.70-$4.80 of non-GAAP EPS and $345-$360 million of free cash flow.[24](#fn-24) That was the second raise of the year. The original 2026 EPS guide was $4.55-$4.70.[25](#fn-25)

![Bar chart of BWXT price divided by the midpoint of 2026 EPS guidance: 51.6 times at the April 15, 2026 high close and 26.8 times at the October 23, 2026 close](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart3_multiple.png)

Source: BWXT earnings releases[5](#fn-5) and Perplexity Finance[22](#fn-22) closes. Multiples are my arithmetic.

Divide the price by the midpoint of the guidance in force at the time. At the April 15 close of $238.42 the stock traded at 51.6 times the $4.625 midpoint. At $127.19 it trades at 26.8 times the $4.75 midpoint. Guidance went up. The multiple halved.

Free cash flow guidance of $345-$360 million against a market value of about $11.65 billion works out to roughly a 3% free cash flow yield, by my arithmetic.[26](#fn-26) That is not cheap in an absolute sense. It is a lot less expensive than it was six months ago, for a business that the policy is moving toward.

## The free-market read

Let me give the other side its due first. The best argument against this rule is that DOE and the military are not neutral. DOE wants reactors built. The Army wants power on its bases. Nieh said it himself: with DOE, "they're the developer. They're trying to encourage innovation; they want to move quicker".[17](#fn-17) An independent regulator that leans on a promoter's data is a real risk. NRC staff flagged the worry that the rule could be seen as a shortcut around the agency's mission.[17](#fn-17)

I take that seriously. And I still come down on the side of the rule, for three reasons I can point to in the text.

First, nothing is delegated. The rule says "Nothing in this rule delegates to DOE, DOW, or any other agency the NRC's functions" and nothing "allows the NRC to forego an independent review".[27](#fn-27) Second, the burden stays on the applicant to justify every piece of borrowed evidence. Third, the alternative is not more safety. It is the same test run twice, with the second run paid for by customers who wait years longer for power.

Here is what I keep coming back to. Information is the scarcest input in any market, and a test reactor that went critical is information. Throwing it away because the wrong agency collected it is not caution. It is waste with a safety label on it.

You do not get cheaper, cleaner baseload power by making every builder prove the same physics to three agencies. You get it by letting the evidence travel. That is what this rule does. Pro-market is not pro-incumbent, and the firms that gain most here are the new entrants with a prototype and no 40-year licensing department.

## The bear case

I could be wrong on the idea in several specific ways, and you should hold me to them.

- **Criticality is not a power plant.** All five DOE reactors reached zero-power or low-power criticality. POWER notes these tests "do not demonstrate sustained electricity production or performance of a complete commercial reactor plant".[6](#fn-6) The data a commercial applicant can borrow may be thinner than the headlines suggest.
- **The NRC itself says the evidence may not cover the full commercial case.** A DOE or military authorization "may not fully represent a commercial reactor configuration or the breadth of analyses necessary for an NRC licensing basis".[27](#fn-27)
- **Timelines are long.** BWXT's Fort Campbell reactor is a 20-megawatt version of its BANR design, with groundbreaking projected for late 2028 and operations in the early 2030s.[28](#fn-28) The Army said plainly that "there's a very real chance that one or more of these companies will fail".[29](#fn-29)
- **Fuel is a bottleneck.** The Army's plan comes amid a uranium enrichment shortage and heavy reliance on imported enriched uranium.[30](#fn-30)
- **BWXT's own execution.** Management expects about 55% of second-half 2026 earnings in the fourth quarter, and it lowered its Commercial segment margin outlook to about 13% from about 14% as it invests in capacity.[31](#fn-31) A back-loaded year leaves little room for a slip.
- **Rates.** If long yields keep rising, the stock can keep falling no matter what the NRC does.

## The Idea

**BWX Technologies (BWXT), $127.19 at the Oct. 23 close.**

BWXT builds naval reactors for the U.S. Navy, makes nuclear fuel and components, and is building the microreactors the military wants. Most of its $8.40 billion backlog sits in Government Operations.[5](#fn-5)

Why this rule helps it. BWXT is on both sides of the new pathway. It is the reactor builder for the Department of War's Project Pele prototype, which completed core barrel cartridge installation in September 2026.[32](#fn-32) It holds the Army's Janus slot at Fort Campbell for a 20-megawatt BANR.[33](#fn-33) And it makes the TRISO fuel other developers need.[20](#fn-20) Once those military reactors run, the new Section 50.43(f) and the revised Section 53.440 let BWXT bring that operating evidence to an NRC application for a commercial version.

Why not Oklo? Oklo owns the only public DOE-authorized reactor that has gone critical, and I think the rule helps it. But Groves is an isotope test reactor, distinct from Oklo's Aurora power reactor[6](#fn-6), and Oklo has no earnings to value. BWXT pays you to wait with a profitable naval franchise.

What the market may be missing. Investors have treated BWXT as an AI-power momentum stock and sold it with that trade.[34](#fn-34) At 26.8 times the midpoint of guidance it raised twice, by my arithmetic, the price now leans on the government business and gives little credit for a commercial microreactor path that just got a regulatory road.

What would prove me wrong. A cut to 2026 guidance on Nov. 2, a delay or cancellation of Pele or the Fort Campbell project, or an NRC application that references a DOE or military authorization and still gets a full from-scratch review. Any of those breaks the thesis. No price target. I keep score on every idea here, winners and losers: [the FMR Idea Scorecard](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/idea-scorecard/).

## What to watch next

- **Oct. 26:** The rule is published in the Federal Register.[35](#fn-35)
- **Nov. 2:** BWXT reports third-quarter 2026 results.[36](#fn-36) Watch the fourth-quarter weighting and any microreactor revenue commentary. I track dated catalysts like this on the [Catalyst Calendar](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-deregulation-investors-catalyst-calendar/).
- **Nov. 25:** The rule takes effect.[37](#fn-37)
- **The guidance:** The NRC's draft interim staff guidance on this pathway, published for comment April 17, 2026, still has to be finalized.[27](#fn-27)
- **Part 57:** The final microreactor licensing framework, which would carry the same pathway.[27](#fn-27)
- **The first applicant:** No developer has yet been identified as planning an NRC application that references a DOE authorization.[6](#fn-6) The first one is the real test of whether the review actually gets shorter.

The cycle does not wait for consensus. The test reactors are already critical, the Army checks are already written, and as of Nov. 25 the paperwork finally knows they exist.

## Sources

1. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, Oct. 26, 2026](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
2. [POWER Magazine, Oct. 22, 2026](https://www.powermag.com/nrc-finalizes-rule-allowing-reactor-applicants-to-use-doe-dow-demonstration-data/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (powermag.com)
3. [U.S. Army, Janus program announcement](https://www.army.mil/article/294891/army%5Freaches%5Fagreement%5Fwith%5Fprivate%5Findustry%5Ffor%5Fnuclear%5Fmicro%5Freactors?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (army.mil)
4. [Perplexity Finance, BWXT](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/BWXT?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
5. [BWXT second-quarter 2026 release](https://investors.bwxt.com/static-files/0cf6f9a9-4adb-454c-846e-fb5ba9290932?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (investors.bwxt.com)
6. [POWER Magazine](https://www.powermag.com/nrc-finalizes-rule-allowing-reactor-applicants-to-use-doe-dow-demonstration-data/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (powermag.com)
7. [U.S. Department of Energy](https://www.energy.gov/articles/department-energy-celebrates-fourth-criticality-ahead-july-4th-goal?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (energy.gov)
8. [NRC news release 26-081, Oct. 22, 2026](https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/news-releases/2026/26-081?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (nrc.gov)
9. [NRC news release 26-081](https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/news-releases/2026/26-081?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (nrc.gov)
10. [POWER Magazine, quoting EO 14300](https://www.powermag.com/nrc-finalizes-rule-allowing-reactor-applicants-to-use-doe-dow-demonstration-data/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (powermag.com)
11. [NRC Sunshine Act notice 2026-21729](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/23/2026-21729.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
12. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, Sec. IV](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
13. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, amended Sec. 50.43](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
14. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, Sec. VI](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
15. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, Sec. II, citing 91 FR 23628](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
16. [American Nuclear Society, Oct. 22, 2026](https://www.ans.org/news/2026-10-22/article-8512/nrc-finalizes-rule-on-licensing-reactors-with-prior-doe-or-dod-authorization/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (ans.org)
17. [American Nuclear Society](https://www.ans.org/news/2026-10-22/article-8512/nrc-finalizes-rule-on-licensing-reactors-with-prior-doe-or-dod-authorization/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (ans.org)
18. [POWER Magazine, Oklo Groves](https://www.powermag.com/oklos-groves-becomes-fifth-doe-pilot-reactor-to-reach-criticality-first-on-private-land/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (powermag.com)
19. [U.S. Army](https://www.army.mil/article/294891/army%5Freaches%5Fagreement%5Fwith%5Fprivate%5Findustry%5Ffor%5Fnuclear%5Fmicro%5Freactors?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (army.mil)
20. [BWXT release, June 2026](https://investors.bwxt.com/node/17271/pdf?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (investors.bwxt.com)
21. [NRC news release 26-079](https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/news-releases/2026/26-079?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (nrc.gov)
22. [Perplexity Finance](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/BWXT?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
23. [Perplexity Finance, OKLO](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/OKLO?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
24. [BWXT second-quarter 2026 release, Aug. 3, 2026](https://investors.bwxt.com/static-files/0cf6f9a9-4adb-454c-846e-fb5ba9290932?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (investors.bwxt.com)
25. [BWXT fourth-quarter 2025 release](https://investors.bwxt.com/static-files/5b5b3eff-5db9-4130-8be8-8f3c5b4af5a2?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (investors.bwxt.com)
26. [Perplexity Finance, BWXT market value](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/BWXT?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
27. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801, Sec. II](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
28. [Fort Campbell press release, Aug. 26, 2026](https://home.army.mil/campbell/6517/8779/2228/PRESS%5FRELEASE%5F26-012%5FFort%5FCampbell%5Fselected%5Fto%5Fhost%5FNext-Generation%5FAdvanced%5FEnergy%5FResilience%5FProject.pdf?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (home.army.mil)
29. [DefenseScoop, Aug. 26, 2026](https://defensescoop.com/2026/08/26/army-annouces-initiial-bases-to-host-nuclear-microreactors/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (defensescoop.com)
30. [Defense One, Aug. 26, 2026](https://www.defenseone.com/business/2026/08/army-selects-5-companies-build-nuclear-microreactors-bases-under-new-2-billion-deal/415653/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (defenseone.com)
31. [Zacks, Oct. 2026](https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/3007113/bwxt-falls-198-in-3-months-does-the-pullback-create-opportunity?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (zacks.com)
32. [BWXT, Project Pele](https://www.bwxt.com/sectors/defense-space/land/project-pele/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (bwxt.com)
33. [Fort Campbell press release](https://home.army.mil/campbell/6517/8779/2228/PRESS%5FRELEASE%5F26-012%5FFort%5FCampbell%5Fselected%5Fto%5Fhost%5FNext-Generation%5FAdvanced%5FEnergy%5FResilience%5FProject.pdf?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (home.army.mil)
34. [Perplexity Finance, BWXT news summary](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/BWXT?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
35. [Federal Register document 2026-21801](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/10/26/2026-21801/nrc-reviews-of-reactor-designs-previously-authorized-by-us-department-of-energy-or-department-of-war?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)
36. [StockTitan, BWXT earnings date](https://www.stocktitan.net/overview/BWXT/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (stocktitan.net)
37. [Federal Register final rule 2026-21801](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full%5Ftext/text/2026/10/26/2026-21801.txt?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (federalregister.gov)

## Related analysis

- [The NRC Just Rewrote the Reactor Rulebook. Uranium Is the Trade.](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-nrc-just-rewrote-the-reactor-rulebook-uranium-is-the-trade/)
- [FERC Told PJM You Cannot Curtail Your Way Out of a Shortage](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/ferc-told-pjm-you-cannot-curtail-your-way-out-of-a-shortage/)
- [The DOE Just Tried to Make Its Own Deregulation Permanent](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-doe-just-tried-to-make-its-own-deregulation-permanent/)

Know someone who should be reading this?

One deregulation story and one stock idea, every day, free. Send it to someone who thinks markets work better than mandates.

[Share on X](https://x.com/intent/post?text=The%20NRC%20Will%20Stop%20Re-Testing%20Reactors%20the%20Government%20Already%20Ran%20via%20%40leadlagreport&url=https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/the-nrc-will-stop-re-testing-reactors-the-government-already-ran/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Dx%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare&ref=freemarketsreport.com)[Share on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/the-nrc-will-stop-re-testing-reactors-the-government-already-ran/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Dlinkedin%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare&ref=freemarketsreport.com)[Forward by email](mailto:?subject=The%20NRC%20Will%20Stop%20Re-Testing%20Reactors%20the%20Government%20Already%20Ran&body=One%20deregulation%20story%20and%20one%20stock%20idea%20a%20day%2C%20free.%20This%20one%20is%20worth%20your%20time%3A%20https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/the-nrc-will-stop-re-testing-reactors-the-government-already-ran/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Demail%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare)[Join free](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/?utm%5Fsource=fmr%5Farticle&utm%5Fmedium=cta&utm%5Fcampaign=join#/portal/signup/free)

---

*The Free Markets Report is provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. All opinions and views mentioned in this report constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time. Information within this material is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any individual investor. Trading signals produced by the Free Markets Report are independent of other services provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC or its affiliates, and positioning of accounts under their management may differ. Please remember that investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and past performance may not be indicative of future results. Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC, its members, officers, directors and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The Free Markets Report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of our investment services or performance. THE INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF INDIVIDUALS WHO MIGHT RECEIVE IT. THE INVESTMENTS DISCUSSED MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS. INVESTORS MUST MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTMENT DECISIONS BASED ON THEIR OWN PARTICULAR FINANCIAL SITUATIONS AND OBJECTIVES. This report is not an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services in any jurisdiction in which Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC is not authorized to provide such services. All investments involve risk, including the risk of loss of principal. No representation is being made that any security, account, or strategy is or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown. Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, and Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC's charges and expenses. This report is not a prospectus and does not contain all of the information necessary to fully evaluate any security or strategy discussed, including, but not limited to, the risk of adverse effects of related market developments. You should not rely solely on the information contained in this report, and should seek advice based on your situation from a licensed investment professional. Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of any investment product before investing. This report may not be copied or distributed without the express written consent of Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. Any decisions made based on any or all of the information in this writing are the sole responsibility of the user, and the user should exercise caution and take appropriate advice before acting.*