> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.freemarketsreport.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# A Judge Certified an 80/20 Tip Case. Three Days Later, Labor Buried the Rule.
- URL: https://www.freemarketsreport.com/a-judge-certified-an-80-20-tip-case-then-labor-buried-the-rule/
- Published: 2026-10-26T15:16:59.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-26T15:16:59.000Z
- Description: On Oct. 19 the Labor Department withdrew the last letters behind the 80/20 tip side-work rule, three days after a judge certified an Olive Garden tip-credit collective. The mechanism, the winners, the bear case and one stock idea.
- Author: Michael A. Gayed, CFA

**On Oct. 16 a federal judge in Massachusetts let Olive Garden servers and bartenders proceed as a collective action over tip-credit pay, and one of their theories is the old 80/20 side-work rule. Three days later the Labor Department withdrew the last three opinion letters that rule was built on and said in writing that any time limit on duties inside a tipped job "no longer reflects WHD policy." I think that bulletin is the most useful thing Washington has done for full-service restaurants in years. Not because it cuts anyone's pay. Because it ends a forty-year argument over a percentage that Congress never wrote into the law.**

## Key Highlights

- **The bulletin:** Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-1, dated Oct. 19, 2026, withdraws Opinion Letters FLSA-895 (1979), WH-502 (1980) and FLSA-854 (1985) and confirms that "any guidance that contemplates specific time limits on duties performed within a tipped occupation no longer reflects WHD policy".[1](#fn-1)
- **The money per hour:** An employer taking the federal tip credit must pay a cash wage of at least $2.13 an hour and may count up to $5.12 an hour of tips toward the $7.25 minimum.[1](#fn-1)
- **The case:** In Kappler v. Olive Garden Holdings, No. 4:23-cv-40106, Judge Indira Talwani conditionally certified a collective of Olive Garden servers and bartenders paid below the standard minimum wage on Oct. 16, 2026; no court has found the companies liable.[2](#fn-2)
- **The workforce:** Waiters and waitresses held 2,270,910 jobs in May 2025, with a mean hourly wage of $19.26.[3](#fn-3)
- **The idea:** Darden Restaurants (DRI) spent $1,028.9 million on restaurant labor in its fiscal first quarter, 32.2% of sales, and trades at about 19.0 times the midpoint of its fiscal 2027 earnings guidance by my arithmetic.[4](#fn-4), [5](#fn-5)

Here is the whole fight in one sentence. For decades a server who rolled silverware for 19% of a shift was a tipped employee, and the same server at 21% was owed a different wage for part of the week, depending on who ran the Labor Department that year.

That is not a rule. That is a coin toss with lawyers.

![Timeline of the federal 80/20 tip side-work guidance from 1988 to 2026, showing it added in 1988, rescinded in 2018, codified with a 30-minute limit in 2021, vacated by the Fifth Circuit in 2024, removed from the handbook in January 2025 and its source letters withdrawn on October 19, 2026](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart1_timeline-9.png)

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, FAB 2026-1[6](#fn-6); Holland & Hart[7](#fn-7) (2018 opinion letter); Cole Schotz[8](#fn-8) (2024 ruling).

## The surface story

The headline version reads like housekeeping. On Oct. 19 the Wage and Hour Division sent a memo to its regional offices withdrawing three letters written between 1979 and 1985.[6](#fn-6) Employment lawyers covered it as a cleanup step after a court loss two years ago.[9](#fn-9) Bloomberg Law called it the department entrenching its shift on time limits.[10](#fn-10)

All true. The surface is incomplete.

Those three letters were not museum pieces. One of them described a server whose setup work took "30% to 40% of the employee's workday" and said no tip credit was allowed for that time.[6](#fn-6) In 1988 the agency's Field Operations Handbook turned that into a hard line: more than 20% of the time on general preparation or maintenance, and no tip credit for those hours.[6](#fn-6) That handbook line is the 80/20 rule. It was never a regulation. It was a sentence in a staff manual that plaintiffs, judges and the agency itself kept treating like one.

The bulletin says the letters "may be misread" and, "in some respects, do not accurately state the law".[6](#fn-6) When a regulator says its own guidance misstates the law, you should pay attention to who was relying on that guidance.

## The quiet second document

Now look at the date on the other filing.

On Oct. 16, three days before the bulletin, Judge Talwani granted conditional certification in Kappler v. Olive Garden Holdings, a Fair Labor Standards Act case against Olive Garden Holdings, Darden Corporation and GMRI.[2](#fn-2) The complaint lists several theories. One is a deficient tip-credit notice. One is uniform costs. One is unrelated work like baking bread and washing dishes. And one is excessive side work, the claim that workers "spent more than 20% of their time, or more than 30 minutes in a row, on non-tipped tasks such as rolling silverware, restocking, filling ice and brewing tea and coffee".[2](#fn-2)

Read that last claim again. Twenty percent. Thirty minutes. Those numbers come straight from the 2021 rule the Fifth Circuit vacated in 2024[8](#fn-8), and from the handbook line the department removed in January 2025.[6](#fn-6) The bulletin now removes the last agency document a plaintiff could cite for a percentage test.

I want to be careful here. A bulletin does not decide a lawsuit. Conditional certification "is not a ruling on the merits," and no court has found the companies liable.[2](#fn-2) The notice, uniform and unrelated-work theories do not depend on 80/20 at all. What changes is narrower and, I think, more valuable: the side-work theory loses its government paperwork. That is one less multiplier on every future case in every state that allows the tip credit.

## The mechanism

The law itself is short. Section 3(t) of the Fair Labor Standards Act says a tipped employee is one "engaged in an occupation" in which he customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips.[6](#fn-6) Note the word. Occupation. Not task. Not minute.

The 1967 dual-jobs regulation drew the sensible line. A hotel worker who is both a waiter and a maintenance worker holds two jobs, and the employer can take the tip credit only for the waiter hours.[6](#fn-6) A waitress who also sets tables, toasts bread and makes coffee holds one job, and those duties are part of it.[6](#fn-6) The Fifth Circuit said exactly that in Restaurant Law Center v. Department of Labor: the 1967 rule "focuses on whether the employee performs tasks unrelated to his or her tipped occupation, not the amount of time spent on untipped tasks".[6](#fn-6)

So the test after Oct. 19 is a category question. Is this duty part of being a server? If yes, the tip credit applies. If the worker is actually holding a second job, the hotel waiter who also does maintenance, the employer still cannot take a tip credit for that time.[11](#fn-11)

Here is why that matters to you as an investor. A category test is cheap to comply with. A percentage test is expensive. Under 80/20, a restaurant had to log what every server did, minute by minute, and prove after the fact that side work stayed under a line. The tracking itself was the cost, and the litigation risk was the tail.

![Bar chart of U.S. states by tipped-wage rule as of July 1, 2026: 7 states require the full state minimum wage before tips, 15 states use the federal 2.13 dollar cash wage, and 28 states set a cash wage between those levels](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart2_states.png)

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Minimum Wages for Tipped Employees[12](#fn-12), effective July 1, 2026\. Territories excluded; the count of 28 is my arithmetic.

## Who wins and who loses

Start with the map, because it limits the trade. Seven states, Alaska, California, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, require the full state minimum wage before tips, so the federal tip credit and this bulletin do nothing there.[12](#fn-12) Fifteen states, including Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, use the federal $2.13 cash wage.[12](#fn-12) The rest sit in between with their own rules. The Kappler plaintiffs themselves do not seek to include workers in states that ban the tip credit.[2](#fn-2)

Winners, in order:

**Full-service chains with big footprints in tip-credit states.** Their exposure was never the wage itself. It was the class action built on a percentage. Darden is the largest, with 2,202 company-owned restaurants and 198,111 hourly team members at the end of fiscal 2026.[13](#fn-13)

**Independent restaurants.** This is the part I care about most. A chain can afford timekeeping software and an employment law firm. A family restaurant in Knoxville cannot. A percentage rule enforced through litigation is a toll booth, and it charges the small operator the highest rate. Pro-market is not pro-incumbent, and this one helps the little guy more than the big one.

**Servers who want hours.** Rigid limits on side work push managers to split shifts and hire separate prep staff. A category test lets a server who wants a full shift work one.

Losers: the plaintiffs' bar that built a practice on 80/20, and timekeeping vendors who sold minute-by-minute duty tracking. I will not pretend the workers' side has no argument either. More on that below.

## The numbers

The federal arithmetic is simple. Cash wage $2.13\. Maximum tip credit $5.12\. Minimum wage $7.25.[6](#fn-6) Under 80/20, every hour of side work above the line cost the employer up to $5.12 more, and the plaintiff could ask for that difference across years and across thousands of workers.

Now scale it. There were 2,270,910 waiters and waitresses in the May 2025 survey, earning a mean of $19.26 an hour.[3](#fn-3) That mean wage matters. It tells you the typical server already earns far above $7.25 once tips count. Darden says the same about its own people: hourly team members earned, on average, "more than $24 per hour, inclusive of tip income" in fiscal 2026.[13](#fn-13)

And the company side. Darden's restaurant labor bill was $4,182.4 million in fiscal 2026 on sales of $13,210.9 million.[13](#fn-13) That is about 31.7% of sales, by my arithmetic. In the quarter ended Aug. 30, labor was $1,028.9 million, or 32.2% of sales, down from 32.4% a year earlier.[14](#fn-14) Darden credited productivity improvements and sales mix.[15](#fn-15)

Here is the number I keep coming back to. Darden guides fiscal 2027 sales to $13.60 billion to $13.75 billion.[16](#fn-16) At the midpoint, every 10 basis points of labor as a share of sales is worth about $13.7 million a year, by my arithmetic. I am not claiming the bulletin saves 10 basis points. I am saying labor is a bigger line than food, and small changes in how it is managed move real money.

![Bar chart of Darden fiscal 2027 first quarter cost lines as a percent of sales: restaurant labor 32.2 percent, food and beverage 30.8 percent, restaurant-level EBITDA 18.8 percent](https://storage.ghost.io/c/be/1b/be1bb8f3-f534-4eb9-b00d-09ff49598e5f/content/images/size/w1000/2026/10/chart3_darden.png)

Source: Darden fiscal 2027 first-quarter release[4](#fn-4) (dollars; percentages are my arithmetic) and Investing.com summary of Darden's Q1 slides[15](#fn-15). Quarter ended Aug. 30, 2026.

## The free-market read

Let me make the other side's case first, because it is a real case. The Economic Policy Institute argued that loosening the 80/20 line lets employers pay the $2.13 subminimum wage while servers do an "unlimited amount of nontipped duties," and estimated an earlier version of this change would cost tipped workers more than $700 million a year.[17](#fn-17) Their worry is concrete. A manager hands the server two hours of prep before opening, no tables, no tips, and pays $2.13 for it.

I take that seriously. And I still think the bulletin is right.

First, the law already handles the worst version of that story. The dual-jobs concept survives: an employer "still cannot take a tip credit for time an employee spends working in a separate, non-tipped occupation".[11](#fn-11) The Kappler complaint itself treats baking bread and washing dishes as unrelated work, a separate claim that does not need 80/20.[18](#fn-18)

Second, look at what servers actually earn. A $19.26 mean hourly wage is not the profile of a workforce trapped at $2.13.[19](#fn-19) Servers sort themselves across restaurants by how much they earn per shift. A restaurant that loads its servers with untipped work and kills their hourly take loses them to the place across the street. That is the market doing the enforcement, every Friday night.

Third, and this is the one I feel strongly about, rules that flip with every administration are a tax on everyone. Look at the timeline above. Added in 1988\. Rescinded in 2018.[7](#fn-7) Codified with a 30-minute limit in 2021\. Vacated in 2024\. Scrubbed from the handbook in 2025\. Its source letters withdrawn in 2026.[6](#fn-6) No owner can plan a schedule around a line that moves this often. The fix is to tie the rule back to the words Congress wrote, and that is what this bulletin does.

## The bear case

I could be wrong, and here is how.

**A bulletin is the weakest kind of law.** It is enforcement guidance. A future administration can withdraw it with a memo. In its latest regulatory agenda the Wage and Hour Division said it will issue a new proposal on tipped employees[20](#fn-20), and a rule can be challenged in court. If that proposal adds a new bright line, this whole thesis weakens.

**States can fill the gap.** Twenty-eight states set their own tipped cash wage[21](#fn-21), and some have their own duty rules. A restaurant in a state with its own 80/20 language gets nothing from this.

**Kappler survives on other theories.** The notice, uniform and unrelated-work claims stand on their own.[18](#fn-18) A judge can still read the statute in a way I do not like.

**Labor cost is mostly market wages, not tip-credit rules.** If servers already average more than $24 an hour at Darden, the binding constraint is the labor market, not $5.12 of credit. The benefit here is risk reduction, and risk reduction is hard to see in one quarter.

## The Idea

The Idea is Darden Restaurants (DRI), the operator of Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse and a stable of other full-service brands.

Why this helps Darden. It runs the largest company-owned full-service fleet in the country, 2,202 restaurants.[13](#fn-13) Its biggest cost is restaurant labor, $1,028.9 million or 32.2% of sales last quarter by my arithmetic, ahead of $984.9 million of food and beverage.[4](#fn-4) Its own 10-K lists "tip credits" among the labor laws that govern its operations and wage-and-hour violations among the litigation risks it faces.[13](#fn-13) And it is the named defendant in the most recent certified 80/20 side-work collective.[18](#fn-18)

The valuation. DRI traded at $213.29 on Oct. 26.[5](#fn-5) Against the midpoint of its $11.10 to $11.35 fiscal 2027 earnings guidance[16](#fn-16), that is about 19.0 times, by my arithmetic. The 52-week range is $169 to $229.76.[5](#fn-5)

What the market may be missing. The stock trades on Olive Garden traffic, which grew only 1.1% in same-restaurant sales last quarter.[16](#fn-16) Nobody prices a litigation tail that just got shorter. Darden also books a large FICA tax credit on tips, $164.5 million in fiscal 2026[13](#fn-13), which tells you how much of its server pay runs through gratuities. A clearer tip-credit regime protects that structure.

The risks. Olive Garden traffic is soft. Food costs rose 30 basis points last quarter.[15](#fn-15) The bulletin can be reversed. What would prove me wrong: Darden's restaurant labor ratio rising above last year's 32.4% for two straight quarters, or the Wage and Hour Division's coming tipped-employee proposal restoring a percentage limit. No price target. I keep score on every idea here, winners and losers: [the FMR Idea Scorecard](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/idea-scorecard/).

## What to watch next

Three things. The Kappler parties had 14 days from the Oct. 16 order to confer and file a joint proposed notice to the collective[18](#fn-18); watch whether Darden's lawyers cite the bulletin against the side-work theory. Second, the Wage and Hour Division's promised proposal on tipped employees[22](#fn-22); I track dated deadlines like that on the [Deregulation Investor's Catalyst Calendar](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-deregulation-investors-catalyst-calendar/). Third, Darden's fiscal second-quarter labor line.

You have seen this pattern here before. A court said [engine cleaner is not fuel and the agency agreed](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/a-judge-said-engine-cleaner-is-not-fuel-the-cpsc-just-agreed/), and the SEC finally let [brokers put a target return in writing](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-sec-just-let-brokers-put-a-target-return-in-writing/). The pattern holds. When the agency stops arguing with the statute, the businesses that live under it get to plan again. Watch the restaurants that plan first.

## Sources

1. [U.S. Department of Labor, Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-1](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/fab/fab2026-1.pdf?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (dol.gov)
2. [Open Class Actions, Oct. 17, 2026](https://openclassactions.com/lawsuits/wage-and-hour/olive-garden-servers-bartenders-tip-credit-flsa-collective-action.php?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (openclassactions.com)
3. [Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2025](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.htm?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (bls.gov)
4. [Darden fiscal 2027 first-quarter release](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/940944/000094094426000032/exhibit991-q1fy27.htm?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (sec.gov)
5. [Perplexity Finance, DRI](https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/DRI?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (perplexity.ai)
6. [U.S. Department of Labor, FAB 2026-1](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/fab/fab2026-1.pdf?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (dol.gov)
7. [Holland & Hart](https://www.employerslawyersblog.com/2019/02?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (employerslawyersblog.com)
8. [Cole Schotz](https://www.coleschotz.com/fifth-circuit-strikes-down-the-dol-tip-credit-rule/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (coleschotz.com)
9. [Littler, Oct. 22, 2026](https://www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/dol-reinforces-withdrawal-8020-rule-tipped-employees?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (littler.com)
10. [Bloomberg Law, Oct. 20, 2026](https://news.bgov.com/daily-labor-report/dol-entrenches-shift-on-time-restrictions-for-tipped-workers?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (news.bgov.com)
11. [CWC, Oct. 23, 2026](https://www.cwc.org/CWC/Updates/2026/DOL-Withdraws-Remaining-Guidance-Supporting-The-80-20-Tip-Rule.aspx?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (cwc.org)
12. [U.S. Department of Labor, Minimum Wages for Tipped Employees](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/minimum-wage/tipped?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (dol.gov)
13. [Darden 2026 Form 10-K](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/940944/000094094426000025/dri-20260531.htm?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (sec.gov)
14. [Darden fiscal 2027 first-quarter 10-Q summary](https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/DRI/10-q-darden-restaurants-inc-quarterly-earnings-report-04dfbae82a86.html?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (stocktitan.net)
15. [Investing.com summary of Darden's Q1 slides](https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/darden-q1-fy2027-slides-broad-growth-across-brands-guidance-reaffirmed-93CH-4915644?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (investing.com)
16. [CNBC, Sept. 24, 2026](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/darden-restaurants-dri-q1-2027-earnings.html?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (cnbc.com)
17. [Economic Policy Institute](https://www.epi.org/press/trump-administration-finalizes-regulation-that-will-cost-tipped-workers-more-than-700-million-annually/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (epi.org)
18. [Open Class Actions](https://openclassactions.com/lawsuits/wage-and-hour/olive-garden-servers-bartenders-tip-credit-flsa-collective-action.php?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (openclassactions.com)
19. [Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2025](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.htm?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (bls.gov)
20. [Ogletree, Oct. 23, 2026](https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/beltway-buzz-october-23-2026/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (ogletree.com)
21. [U.S. Department of Labor](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/minimum-wage/tipped?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (dol.gov)
22. [Ogletree](https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/beltway-buzz-october-23-2026/?ref=freemarketsreport.com) (ogletree.com)

## Related analysis

- [The FCC Never Had the Power to Build USAC, a Court Says](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-fcc-never-had-the-power-to-build-usac-a-court-says/)
- [The Treasury Home-Buying Ban Locks In the Biggest Landlords](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/the-treasury-home-buying-ban-locks-in-the-biggest-landlords/)
- [Ten Kinds of Flight Delay Will Stop Counting Against Airlines in 2027](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/ten-kinds-of-flight-delay-will-stop-counting-against-airlines/)

Know someone who should be reading this?

One deregulation story and one stock idea, every day, free. Send it to someone who thinks markets work better than mandates.

[Share on X](https://x.com/intent/post?text=A%20Judge%20Certified%20an%2080/20%20Tip%20Case.%20Three%20Days%20Later%2C%20Labor%20Buried%20the%20Rule.%20via%20%40leadlagreport&url=https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/a-judge-certified-an-80-20-tip-case-then-labor-buried-the-rule/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Dx%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare&ref=freemarketsreport.com)[Share on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/a-judge-certified-an-80-20-tip-case-then-labor-buried-the-rule/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Dlinkedin%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare&ref=freemarketsreport.com)[Forward by email](mailto:?subject=A%20Judge%20Certified%20an%2080/20%20Tip%20Case.%20Three%20Days%20Later%2C%20Labor%20Buried%20the%20Rule.&body=One%20deregulation%20story%20and%20one%20stock%20idea%20a%20day%2C%20free.%20This%20one%20is%20worth%20your%20time%3A%20https%3A//www.freemarketsreport.com/a-judge-certified-an-80-20-tip-case-then-labor-buried-the-rule/%3Futm%5Fsource%3Demail%26utm%5Fmedium%3Dshare)[Join free](https://www.freemarketsreport.com/?utm%5Fsource=fmr%5Farticle&utm%5Fmedium=cta&utm%5Fcampaign=join#/portal/signup/free)

---

*The Free Markets Report is provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. All opinions and views mentioned in this report constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time. Information within this material is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any individual investor. Trading signals produced by the Free Markets Report are independent of other services provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC or its affiliates, and positioning of accounts under their management may differ. Please remember that investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and past performance may not be indicative of future results. Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC, its members, officers, directors and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The Free Markets Report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of our investment services or performance. THE INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF INDIVIDUALS WHO MIGHT RECEIVE IT. THE INVESTMENTS DISCUSSED MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS. INVESTORS MUST MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTMENT DECISIONS BASED ON THEIR OWN PARTICULAR FINANCIAL SITUATIONS AND OBJECTIVES. This report is not an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed as an offer to provide investment advice or services. Nothing in this report shall be construed to be an offer to provide investment advisory services in any jurisdiction in which Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC is not authorized to provide such services. All investments involve risk, including the risk of loss of principal. No representation is being made that any security, account, or strategy is or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown. Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, and Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC's charges and expenses. This report is not a prospectus and does not contain all of the information necessary to fully evaluate any security or strategy discussed, including, but not limited to, the risk of adverse effects of related market developments. You should not rely solely on the information contained in this report, and should seek advice based on your situation from a licensed investment professional. Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of any investment product before investing. This report may not be copied or distributed without the express written consent of Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. Any decisions made based on any or all of the information in this writing are the sole responsibility of the user, and the user should exercise caution and take appropriate advice before acting.*